As I reached for the milk container at the Starbucks at the far end of LAX's Terminal 1, there it was:
According to the warning, and the Prop 65 website, coffee contains acrylamide (a chemical known to cause cancer). It is classified as a neurotoxin, and per a report by the U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA), "several laboratory animal studies have shown that acrylamide causes a variety of tumors in rats and mice."
According to a lawsuit filed by the Committee for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT), a single 12 oz. cup of coffee “contains anywhere from four to 100 times the No Significant Risk Level for acrylamide established by California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.”
According to a lawsuit filed by the Committee for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT), a single 12 oz. cup of coffee “contains anywhere from four to 100 times the No Significant Risk Level for acrylamide established by California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.”
Apparently, coffee has always contained this chemical. The Prop 65 warning itself says that acrylamide is not a chemical added to coffee or any products, but rather created during the roasting of beans. This apparently is the case for coffee we make at home too.*
Proposition 65, the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, was enacted as a ballot initiative in November 1986. The Proposition was intended by its authors to protect California citizens and the State's drinking water sources from chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm, and to inform citizens about exposures to such chemicals.
There was something slightly less-delicious about my coffee that morning. But it was an early flight, so I I drank it - armed with a renewed sense of skepticism. Everything can kill us. Even Starbucks.
*Source: http://www.lovelifewitheo.com/?p=2436